Sept 12, 2001 = (1/2) * (acceleration due to gravity) * [(time)squared]
Part I: Intro, Pictures of Ground Zero, collapse, aftermath
Part II: Formula and walkthough using height of the North Tower
Part III: Video of the North Tower collapse (whole)
Part IV: Quote of World Trade Center Steel
Part V: Segments showing explosions in upper portion of North Tower collapse
Part VI: Conclusion, dedications
1. Photos of Destruction at World Trade Center, people running from the collapse, picture of a woman looking at a wall of the dead
Height = (1/2) (acceleration due to gravity) * (time)squared
The North Tower of the World Trade Center:
- Height of North Tower = 1,368 feet
- Acceleration due to gavity = 32 feet/sec(squared)
- 1,368 = (1/2) (32) (t)squared
- Multiply by both sides by 2: 2,736 = 32t(squared)
- Divide both sides by 32: 85.5 = t(squared)
- Square root of both sides: 9.2 seconds = t
- Solving for time in seconds one gets: 9.2 seconds
- Meaning: an object that goes into complete freefall from the top of the North Tower hits the ground in 9.2 seconds (in a vacuum)
- Time for North Tower to collapse: approimately 10 seconds (.8 second difference for drag from air)
Therefore, the numbers are statistically equal; ergo, the North Tower went into complete freefall.
Had it been a *true* structural failure, it would have taken a much longer time.
- 110 floors of North Tower/2 floors collapsing per second = 55 seconds
- 110 floors of North Tower/3 floors collapsing per second = 36.6 seconds
- 110 floors of North Tower/4 floors collapsing per second = 27.5 seconds
55 seconds, 36.6 seconds and 27.5 seconds are not even close to 9.2 seconds.
Subject: Refuted, not disputed, suckers looted.
"I plan to bring down the Bush Administration"
-Alex Jones before 9/11
You win, Obama is in. Now we have to deal with where to come up with 23 Trillion to pay for it all and what happened to our Country and Constitution. Sotomayor plans to take your guns when the Dems are forced into the Courts. Obama is increasing the war effort in Afghanistan. You'll be in council with an end-of-life councilor after you are no longer of use to the state.
But hay, you want to make 9/11 Truthers rich, go ahead but not on my dime. No more money for this folly.
Subject: Be Objective
It's not beyond comprehension to say that the towers were dropped by a controlled explosion without meaning the government had an ulterior motive?
If that thing fell over sideways, imagine how much it'd take out along the way? Dropping it straight down would be the safest bet, and not that hard to rig up for just such an emergancy. Of course they'd keep it quiet that the building rigged to go, would YOU wanna hang out there?
Plus, wasn't 7 (the one that wasn't hit) a pretty important FBI or CIA office? I heard that somewhere, it'd make sense to get rid of that.
Subject: Too much left unanswered
This is a cover up beyond anything that we can comprehend, let alone want to comprehend.
What was worse was the quote he used in the end from the Nazi party member.
Subject: From the creator
In addition, a previous reviewer mentioned the rooftop antenna dropping before the floors. This is further evidence of a controlled demolition. The World Trade Center had a large central core as seen here:
Thus, had it been a true structural failure, the inner core would have failed *after* the outer core, since it was the north face of the outer core that had sustained the most damage. Thus, the outer core would start falling first. Yet, this is exactly what did *not* happen. A standard controlled demolition destroys the inner parts of the structure so that gravity will start to pull the structure inward upon itself just prior to the outer parts of the structure being destroyed. This is known as a "gravity engine"; such a demolition was performed on the Kingdome in Seattle in March of 2000:
As observed in the video of the North Tower, such a gravity engine was used in its demolition. The inner core was demolished first, which in turn pulled the outer core and floor areas downward after it.
The physics numbers are solid and the mathematics are correct, therefore they cannot be refuted.
Another reviewer asked why the explosives did not detonate upon the plane impacts. C-4 is designed to be very stable and only be set off by specially designed detonators; one can even shoot or burn C-4 without detonating it. In Vietnam, US soldiers burned small blocks of it for use in makeshift stoves in C-ration cans. As such, the fires in the North Tower would not have been enough to detonate preplanted C-4 explosives.
Subject: um i thunk yuse all dun mist tha point darnit
this film is a bloody good job, there needs to be more of it...wake up....theres something fishy in paradise!!!
Subject: You see what you want to see
The quality of the video was poor. The graffics were barely ok but the delays between scenes were eternal. It took forever to get to the point. The narrator sounded very condescending. Sound quality was also poor.
This video was more relevant in revealing the creator(s)' political agenda rather than any so-called proof of government conspiracy. This is nothing more than a cheap propaganda fiction. I would give it no stars if I could.
Subject: Ignore the reviews see for yourselves
1:Hold many times more weight than it was carrying;
2:Withstand the impact and fire from a LARGER plane than the one that hit it;
3:Withstand 4 times the Wind Load it was subjected to on 9/11/2001...
ALL at the SAME TIME,
and yet both towers and WTC building 7 fell (NOT TOPPLED but FELL) at FREEFALL speeds, not impeded at all by the massive, UNDAMAGED structure beneath it, and WAS REDUCED TO POWDER in midair... while at the same time we are to believe that "one of the hijacker's" passport happened to escape the conflagration that burned high-strength steel and concrete to a powder and be found by a senior official as soon as he arrived on scene?
The whole world watched the free-fall collapse of both these towers. Everyone said immediately, 'it looked like one of those controlled demolitions' , why? Because it WAS a controlled demolition.
High powered explosives do NOT detonate from fire either, they need to be detonated on purpose.
And why was the whole US airspace open and unprotected, and why did no Air Force jet scramble to intercept? Because they were ordered not to.
How in God's name could this happen without precise pre-planning and Government collusion?
But, like I say, ignore this review and decide for yourself. If you are in the 4th grade, the mathematics involved should be easy for you to figure out.
This was not a terrorist attack on the United States, it was a murder with the goal of going to war against an arbitrary enemy and the goal of increasing repression of the US population and the goal of decreasing the liberties that our forefathers spilled their BLOOD to earn.
Why would the forces controlling the US government do such a thing? To quote G.W. Bush, "they hate our freedom.
How long before the military arm of corporate power and wealth comes to YOUR home towh to "liberate" you like it did Iraq?
why did someone from unocal go and run afghanistan?
why is it videos tapes where confiscated on the plane that hit the pentagon??
so many videos of the twin towers but only one of the pentagon has been shown. make phone calls ask the people what happened to the video tapes people around the area? like gas stations hotels even the highway cameras?? and to make things even creepier raytheon works for the gov't it has been said that they where working on a plane that may look like the one that hit the pentagon but thats the least of it 5 employees of raytheon died on 9/11 cincidentally they died on a plane... not just on 1 plane but on 3 of the planes that where hi jacked that day...
But you won't hear about that coincidence will you? google it look up the peoples names and where they lived.. look up the obituaries in their home town. Sounds too creepy to me if anyone knows more let me know..tower 7 was detonated of course ...it wasnt hit but you can't set up equipment in a day so it was already predtermined to take it down.
Subject: Eye Witnesses
Subject: Conspiracy Theory
Subject: Utterly Absurd Hypothesis
Subject: Not Convincing
The phyics presented in the first portion is not relevant to the argument.
Subject: Acceleration Due To Gravity
Uploaded by ping127001.com on